Donate to website operating expenses


foreign JBTs exempt from USA laws

As of this writing, 269 individual sheriffs and 8 sheriffs associations have come firmly down on the side of the law, the constitution and the people. Joining us here 1,100 Special Forces (Green Berets), including Major Generals, have published their support for the people and our Constitution against domestic terrorists in suits and ties or any others.

Throughout our military and police forces, the men and women in uniform are telling each other and us that they will not register our firearms, confiscate them, imprison us without cause or fire upon us even if politicians and their supporters order them to.

We are in good company. We are, from the fascists’ perspective, a powerful force resisting their totalitarian dreams.

We know the ruling elite isn’t going to try anything personally. Most 12-year-olds could take them out mano-a-mano. They need JBTs who will do their bidding. Now they and we are seeing their enforcement arm weakening in its willingness to complete the conversion to their lovely New World Order. Where do they go for enforcers?

How about all the places they’ve been bombing, undermining and taking over in our name? Sure, they have made Americans hated in hundreds of places around the world. There are millions of people who would just love to kick some arrogant American butt. I most certainly am not saying we are all deserving that label, but people wearing American-flag patches on their shoulders have destroyed legitimate governments, assaulted people, stolen resources and murdered innocents for generations. Knowing nothing else about us other than we toil under and feed this monster, they quite justifiably HATE US.

When it comes to paying someone back for killing their friends and families, a license to maraud and deal death across the USA would be easy for thousands of them to take.

I have numerous acquaintances in the military who have trained foreign troops in “our” country with “our” weapons on how to dominate, control, and kill people in our cities, rural and undeveloped land. In the last decade (yes, covering both R and D administrations) “we” have thus trained government troops who were supposedly “our” arch enemies just a decade before… and in some cases just a few years earlier.

Our troops (the trainers) are shaking their heads saying, “Crazy”. But it is much worse than that. “Crazy like a fox” is the operative phrase here.

Now Mr. Executive Order, ruler by fiat, Dictator-In-Chief is supposedly exempting foreign agents from our laws. His decree obviously is not legitimate or the law, but it will enable anything we allow it to enable. It is one more monstrous example of how important Constitutional Sheriffs are, as well as state governments who understand and have the courage to exercise their proper authority.

The ramparts are blossoming all across the land. We are being placed on one side. It is exciting to see how many are here with us. It is wise to keep track of who is on the other side.

On to the news that triggered this little diatribe:

Obama Gives Foreign Cops New Police Powers in U.S.

Posted by: The Liberty Beacon™ Staff
Published February 4, 2013

A little-discussed executive order from President Obama giving foreign cops new police powers in the United States by exempting them from such drudgery as compliance with the Freedom of Information Act is raising alarm among commentators who say INTERPOL already had most of the same privileges as diplomats.

At David Horowitz’s Newsreal, Michael van der Galien said the issue is Obama’s expansion of President Ronald Reagan’s order from 1983 that originally granted those diplomatic privileges.

Reagan’s order carried certain exemptions requiring that INTERPOL operations be subject to several U.S. laws such as the Freedom of Information Act. Obama, however, removed those restrictions in his Dec. 16 amendment to Executive Order 12425.

That means, van der Galien wrote today, “this foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse.”

“‘Property and assets,’ including the organization’s records, cannot be searched or seized. Their physical locations are now immune from U.S. legal or investigative authorities,” he wrote.

Obama’s order said he was removing the Reagan limitations on INTERPOL:


“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them,” he wrote.

At the website, authors Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton gave their interpretation of the result.

“In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama’s Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans’ 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves,” they wrote.

“When the paths on the road map converge – Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States – it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body whose INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement,” they said.

“For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL’s central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That they now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with ‘inviolable archives’ from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds,” they said.

“Ultimately, a detailed verbal explanation is due the American public from the President of the United States detailing why an international law enforcement arm assisting a court we are not a signatory to has been elevated above our Constitution upon our soil.”

Records show that the original order designated INTERPOL as a public international organization. Reagan had extended “appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities,” but kept it subject to searches and seizures under appropriate legal circumstances.

Obama’s decision, analysts have concluded, exempted Interpol from all restrictions.

“This international law enforcement body now operates – now operates – on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests,” ThreatsWatch reported.

At the Patriot Room, it was explained there is a reason for a certain level of immunity.

“Before we get our knickers in a bunch, there is logic to this immunity. While we like our Constitution and laws, other countries like their Constitution and laws. It doesn’t matter if the concept of personal freedom is more expansive here. If we expect immunity in their country, we have to extend it to them here.”

But with Obama’s change, “It means that we have an international police force authorized to act within the United States that is no longer subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure.”

Anthony Martin at the Examiner noted the international agency now can operate in the U.S. will “full immunity” from U.S. laws and “with complete independence from oversight from the FBI.”

At National Review Andy McCarthy asked, “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?”

At UNDispatch, which is a blog on the United Nations, Mark Leon Goldberg, who explained he worked at Interpol’s headquarters in France in 2002, said there isn’t much danger of INTERPOL agents whisking Americans off to jail. But he confirmed, “As to the specific reason why the Obama administration would decide, last week, to extend to INTERPOL the same suite of diplomatic privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations? I don’t have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has something to with the accessibility of INTERPOL’s secure criminal databases (on things like stolen passports and the like).”

But the Obama critics at the Obamafile weren’t convinced.

“By this EO, Obama has conferred diplomatic immunity upon INTERPOL, exemption from being subject to search and seizure by law enforcement, exemption from U.S. taxes, and immunity from FOIA requests, etc. … Does INTERPOL have a file on Obama – or his associations?”
Read original here: